Message from the Program Officer
Catherine Loudon
The 2005 SICB meeting
in January in San Diego featured another outstanding set of
presentations on diverse topics, and thanks to all of the presenters,
symposium organizers, the other members of the Program Committee (the
Divisional Program Officers and representatives from other affiliated
societies), the SICB webmaster, and the excellent staff of Burk and
Associates for making it such a positive experience for so many
individuals.
Room size
assignments for sessions
While we received many
positive comments about the quality of the talks and the poster
sessions, as well as the relatively small number of conflicts, there
were clearly some mismatches between room sizes and attendance in
some of the sessions. In order to improve our predictions for
attendance, we did gather data for the first time at the 2005 meeting
(head counts were taken by the student workers at different times in
the different sessions, for all contributed sessions and symposia) to
help us make more accurate guesses for the 2006 meetings. The room
assignments are made at the Program Planning meeting (in the fall
before the annual meeting) by the full Program Committee after
scheduling all of the sessions to minimize scientific overlap as much
as possible (there are usually about a dozen simultaneous sessions at
all times). The procedure for making the room assignments is to
consider all of the simultaneous sessions, sort them in order of
estimated attendance, and then pair sessions with the available
rooms. In addition we try and put sessions closer to each other
(physically) if we expect that attendees may be going back and forth
between them. We do intend to make the head counts a regular part of
the student worker assignments.
Contributed sessions
that are associated with symposia
Another first for the
2005 meeting was that all symposia had the option of associated
contributed sessions (both posters and contributed talks). This
meant that during abstract submission, a presenter of a contributed
talk or poster could choose to be associated with a symposium (the
sessions were identified as such in the program). This option was
extremely popular with both symposium organizers and presenters, as
it allowed a symposium to expand beyond the confines of the small set
of invited speakers. We plan to continue this new option for the
2006 meeting.
Changes in Best
Student Paper policy
Starting with the 2006
meeting, students who have already received a first place award in
any division will be ineligible to compete for another award in any
division in that same format (i.e. talk or poster) in subsequent
years. For example, an individual who has already won first place
for a talk (in any division) could subsequently compete for a poster
award in any division but not for a talk in any division. Similarly,
a student presentation may only be entered for a single award in a
single division at any given meeting (so a poster may be entered for
a best poster award in one division and a talk by the same student
may be entered for a best talk award in the same or another division
at the same meeting, but a single poster may not be simultaneously
considered for awards by two different divisions). Divisions are
encouraged to include former awardees in judging.
Changes in DCPB,
DEE, and DIZ bylaws recommended by the Program Committee
The Program Committee
unanimously recommends a change in policy regarding the Best Student
Paper award that will necessitate voting by three of the nine SICB
divisions (DCPB, DEE, and DIZ). Specifically, the Program Committee
recommends that those three divisions eliminate the divisional
affiliation requirements that they have for their Best Student Paper
awards (this requirement is in the bylaws of these three divisions)
because of the difficulties of enforcing such requirements. These
are the only three divisions (out of the nine divisions that offer
some sort of Best Student Paper award) that have divisional
affiliation requirements. Because individuals can register for the
meeting after they submit abstracts, new student members (or lapsed
student members) are not members of any division when they submit
their abstracts, and so a divisional affiliation requirement cannot
be required at abstract submission, but must be communicated to the
student. At the Program Planning meeting at the beginning of the
fall (which occurs immediately after abstract submissions end but
before registration ends), all student competitors are scheduled so
that individuals competing in any division are not scheduled at the
same time (to make it easier for the judges of any division to make
all of the talks). Fully 50% of the entries in one large division
were subsequently found to be ineligible (either because the students
didn't know which division they were in or they did not understand or
follow the divisional requirement). The Program Committee would
regret the necessity of having to eliminate students from competition
because of the divisional affiliation rules, but it is extremely
time-consuming to communicate with the network of students, division
judges, and division officers to bring everyone into compliance.
Each division does administer its own student award competition, and
chooses how many awards, what kind of awards, the amount of the
awards, and the criteria for choosing awardees, and this would not
change.
SICB 2006 in Orlando
and beyond
Looking ahead to the
2006 meeting in Orlando, I am happy to report another set of
stimulating and diverse symposia. Please see the SICB website for a
list of these symposia. The complete program for the 2006 SICB
meeting will be finalized in October 2005 at the annual Program
Planning Meeting, which is also when symposia for 2007 will be
chosen. Symposia are now planned over a year ahead of time, allowing
the symposium organizers time to prepare their symposia and apply for
funding. Therefore, it is time to look ahead to our 2007 meeting in
Phoenix, and many individuals are already working on symposium or
workshop ideas for that meeting. You are encouraged to discuss
symposium ideas with your divisional program officers and incoming
Program Officer Linda Walters (ljwalter@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu) and
submit a symposium proposal
(http://sicb.org/meetings/2007/index.php3; deadline August 19, 2005).
More information about symposium proposal submission appears on the
SICB website.
I look forward to
seeing you all in Orlando in January 2006!